This lesson meets the needs of the year five Humanities and Social Sciences Australian Curriculum Document (HSSACD), linking directly with the content descriptor (ACHASSI094) as students identify the cause and effect of proposed and actual tourism developments (ACARA, 2016). As students engage with real-world learning through actual scenarios they will cultivate understandings linked to year five Geography content descriptor (ACHASSK113) “The environmental and human influences on the location and characteristics of a place and the management of spaces within them”, developing their own empathy and informed moral standpoint. This unit of work focuses directly on the proposed cable car development at Tasmania’s Cradle Mountain National Park. In order to construct an informed opinion around the validity of this development, students will begin by first investigating the impact of other international developments.
This lesson will develop students’ understanding of the importance of recognising the viewpoint of all stake-holders impacted by significant developments. Engagement with individual stories of those involved develop students empathetic and analytic mindset from which to create their own informed opinion Reynolds (2014). Furthermore, The Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians (MCEETYA, 2008) argues that a schools legacy to its students should be to develop engaged citizens whom act with a moral and ethical integrity.
Through critically analysing tourism development examples from around the world, students begin to identify differences and similarities to the proposed Cradle Mountain development. Factors including economic gain, employment, sustainability, environmental impact, important stakeholders’ viewpoints and the potential boost in tourism will be the focus of investigations. Tudball & Gordon (2014) suggest that through such investigations into real world scenarios students gain a more insightful and holistic understanding.
The lesson will begin with students being divided into groups of five, each group provided with a highly-scaffolded investigation pack. The packs will focus on the Singapore cable cars, Suez Canal and the Chinese Three Gorges Dam. The pack will include information on a significant development which has occurred in another country, such as:
- Before and after photographs, including aerial pictures.
- An investigative question sheet with probing questions to guide individual aspects of the research. Students will be required to add two other areas for probe investigations.
- short statements from different stakeholders involved in the development
- Information pertaining key economic outcomes, such as total cost, tourism statistics, environmental impact and the impact on the lives of local residents
Each student in the group will choose one of the probe questions investigated by their group, sharing their findings with the class. The teacher will encourage students to identify similarities and differences between their international development and that of the other groups. The higher order thinking which can, as Reynolds (2014) highlights, eventuate from open class discussions will enable students to thoughtfully engage with the Cradle Mountain Cable Car proposal in the following lesson. This next lesson will involve students being randomly assigned the roll of either national park ranger, tourism operator, local chef, international tourist, local building firm, Tasmanian tourism manager or conservationist. Students will develop a short presentation using their previously constructed understandings as they identify similarities and differences between the impact on environment and people studied in the international cases to that of the Cradle Mountain Proposal. Adopting this imagined position, students, as Hoodless (2003) explains will begin to internalise their thinking as they put forward their case for their support or opposition to the proposed development in a mock council community inquiry meeting.
Reference:
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016a). The Australian curriculum (v.7.5): Geography. Retrieved from http://v7- 5.australiancurriculum.edu.au/humanities-and-social- sciences/geography/curriculum/f-10?layout=1#level5
Hoodless, P. (Ed.) (2003). Teaching humanities in primary schools. Exeter: Learning Matters
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/national_declaration_on_the_educational_goals_for_young_australians.pdf
Reynolds, R. (2014). Teaching humanities and social sciences in the primary school (3rd ed.) South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
Tudball, L., & Gordon, K. (2014). Teaching for active and informed citizenship. In Gilbert, R., & Hoepper, B. (Eds.), Teaching humanities and social sciences: History, geography, economics and citizenship in the Australian Curriculum (5th ed.) (pp. 176-196).South Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning Aust